Hope is not a viable investment strategy.
Reason #46: One more reason that Americans will never support effective measures to combat global climate change – they'd have to give up their power-guzzling big-screen high-definition TVs. Ain't gonna happen.
Usual Suspect: A suicide bombing killed several senior Iranian Revolutionary Guard officers. “ Surely foreign elements, particularly those linked to the global arrogance, were involved in this attack,” said Iranian television. “Linked to the global arrogance” - wonder who that could be?
Put a Cork in It: Some researchers have demonstrated evolution, natural selection and all, in a bottle.
Fairly Unballanced: Somebody finally noticed that Fox News is not news, but opinion journalism, a wing of the Republican Party, a propaganda machine masquerading as a legitimate news organization. What took the adults so long to catch on?
Promises, Promises: Geithner says the US must live within its means – once the economy recovers, if it ever does, or what little global confidence there is in the dollar will erode. In other words, it's a confidence game. But you already knew that.
Rubbing it In: After successful raids on oilfields in Africa, China now has its sights on drilling rights in the Gulf of Mexico, which – despite its name – America views as a private reserve. Enter a chorus of politicians...
Non-negotiable: Most of the world's decision-makers think they can negotiate with the laws of physics and chemistry, and continue signing a long series of useless treaties that will become a global suicide note. Even the brutal truth that we are ''on the edge of a precipice beyond which there is no redemption'' may not be enough to move the world to action. Even doing something, but not enough, will lead to disaster. The planet cannot be bought off.
More of the Same: Delinquency is on the rise. No, not the juvenile kind, the indebted consumer kind. In September a record 7.65% of mortgages were 30 or more days late. In sub-prime mortgages it's over 40%. Delinquencies also rose on home equity loans and auto loans.
More of the Same: Sunday's NY Times sees a bright and happy future for the US, based on endless greed without any moral constraint or responsibility.
The High Priced Spread: Expect oil to trend higher. Global demand is expected to rise from this year's 84.6 mbd to over 86 mbd in 2010 – and that's the level of demand that drove prices to $150 in mid-2008. Add in the decline of the dollar and recovery-dampening oil prices look to be a sure thing.
Keeping Score: The Dow has broken 10,000 for the 26th time, with the first time being more than a decade ago. In lieu of gifts, please direct donations to a local homeless shelter.
Ennui: It is becoming evident that we are sinking slowly into an economic depression. The middle class now lives from paycheck to paycheck. Half of mortgage owners have no equity, no sense of ownership in their houses. Nearly 20% are unemployed or underemployed. Millions more will be evicted before Washington gets through sending money to Wall Street. But still the people slumber in front of the TV. Anger? What's the point?
How'd GS Do It? It was easy. We gave them $76 billion, loaned them $2 trillion more at less than 1% and then guaranteed their losses. Or something like that. And where's that anger?
Solomonic solution: Some argue for deflation. Others point to quantitative easing and scream inflation. Who's right? Both. For the immediate future, Americans' net worth will decrease and their food and energy bills will increase, while house prices fall as the economy suffers the effects of both inflation and deflation. We live in interesting times.
4 comments:
Fairly Unballanced:
Couldn't agree more... Add all other MSM outlets to the above for a truly balanced view. Why allow your own biases get in the way of the truth.
Good point, Anony 1213. But I forgot the MSM, because they are forgettable. They are at best entertainment and at worst panderers to power. They too but pretend to be news organizations. I apologize for any credit I may have inadvertently given them.
As for my own biases, well the opening colophon says "This is all someone's opinion". Mainly mine. And I have no biases whatsoever, being blessed with perfect pitch, absolute clarity and an unfailing sense of what is good and true.
For goodness sake, you and the White House are such a bunch of whiners. How can one cable channel be much of a threat... unless the White House lets them, which is exactly what the thin-skinned pinheads in the administration have done.
Instead of coming armed with several factual examples of erroneous reporting by Foxnews, Axelrod and Emanuel came across as childish on Sunday, and all that Dunn got for her trouble was being exposed as a Maoist.
Brilliant!
You act as though before Foxnews, the media was pure, unbiased and fair-minded. And wasn't Foxnews around when Obama got elected?
The following comment below the article you linked to is good:
Why is this a big deal? Murdoch has found quite a niche and is making good money. If that's a problem, then other networks should attempt to chip away at Fox's market share.
However, when CNN trots out schoolchildren to sing a song asking for Obama to reform health care, you can tell that's not happening.
CBS looked asinine when it allowed Dan Rather to expose the forged memo. I don't remember the White House going at great lengths to avoid CBS after that.
Let each media outlet decide how they want to present their coverage. It's their right. And the White House has the same right to use or not use whichever outlets they see fit.
Meantime, CNN asks a psychiatrist: Why do people listen to Rush Limbaugh?
And they fact check an SNL skit about Obama.
And this is supposedly the “objective” cable news network.
Post a Comment