Seriously.
I've
had all of Trump I can handle for a while, even as entertainment. So
today's screed is on a more serious subject than who gets to loot
America and the world for the next four years.
On
October 7th, The Telegraph wrote a particularly misleading article
on the continuing retreat of Arctic Ice cover, with a seriously
misleading headline - Experts
said Arctic sea ice would melt entirely by Sept '16... It was
picked up and bandied about by Drudge, among others, as a supposed
refutation of global warming.
The
“experts' were actually just Peter Wadhams, an Arctic Ice expert at
Cambridge University who had given interviews on the September 1st
publication of A
Farewell to Ice - his detailed but highly readable account of the
science involved in the demise of Arctic ice and the rather nasty
things that will follow. After discussing the science and the trend
of Arctic Ice cover, he did not say that the ice would be gone by
2016 but that “a Blue Ocean Event may well happen earlier than the
trend, e.g. in September 2017. But more likely at 2022 and certainly
by 2027.”
Was
the Arctic ice-free this September? No, it was tied for the
second lowest extent in recorded history at 4.7 million square
kilometers – just 54% of the September
average in the 1980's. And the ice is now just 1.9 meters thick
instead of the 3.64 meters back in 1980. So there's less of less.
The
National Snow and Ice
Data Center's graph of the average monthly sea ice for September,
from 1978 to 2016, projects there to be no ice by about 2038. But to
climate scientists, 'no Arctic ice” means less than 1 million
square kilometers, and that date will certainly
show up by 2030.
The
Third U.S. National
Climate Assessment reports that the Arctic Ocean is expected to
be ice free in summer before mid-century. Models that best match
historical trends project a nearly ice-free Arctic in the summer by
the 2030s.
Note
that the remaining ice is thin and getting thinner and will melt
faster and faster and the open water is exposed longer and longer to
the sun's rays, getting warmer and warmer, so an earlier date is
likely.
Why
have I taken the time to investigate this and then bother you with
it?
Because
the 2014 Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change
Fifth Assessment Report
did not. The IPCC does not factor in any warming from the decreased
albedo – ice and snow reflect back into space about 90% of the
sun's incoming radiation, dark open ocean water reflects back only
abut 20%. That change in albedo has the same effect as “adding
20 years of CO2 emissions.”
Nor
does their latest report address the
methane release that a warming Arctic guarantees.
Another
feedback is
water vapor. A warmer atmosphere carries more water vapor. Since
water vapor is a potent greenhouse gas, this further accelerates
warming over the Arctic.
These
feedback loops will greatly increase the warming of not just the
Arctic, but of the world. Quite possibly to unlivable levels,
possibly long before 2100.
11 comments:
Sleep well? Perhaps not. The levels of humidity we have had this summer have been too high for comfort. With the extended warm period limiting activity one only cheered up when a brief westerly with real air gave some respite. But any rain that came that did refresh then became the later humidity. It looks as though we can't win.
Look up Calthrate Gun, and know that this was taught when I was a chemical engineering student in the 1970's.
It's going to be pretty fast when it hits.
Thank you for this. Current temps haven't been seen in 120,000 years. Locked in for temps not seen for 2m. yrs. due to the 10-30 yr. lag in current emissions having their full impact. Even w/o calthrate guns. $10 carbon taxes won't stop or even slow any of this and that's the best on offer.
Love your children and grandchildren as much as they will let you. That's the only good legacy that we can leave them now.
Clathrate gun.
Not to distract from this important issue but it does point directly at what I've been, er, 'saying'. How do we fix this given the current politicians want you to think it doesn't exist?
Short answer is we can't if we sit on our hands and squander elections like the current mockery that plans on (after much ado) turning the reins over to Hillary and we'll get four years of overturning Citizen's United. [and maybe a half-hearted stab at the ERA, which will fail again and should amaze no one.]
If you act like a doormat, try not to be surprised when they use you for one!
Well, there's a simple automatic solution.
The pessimists will stop breeding, the optimists won't. The world will get warmer AND more optimistic. Meaning that, everything will be not only warmer but even MORE awesome!
Dude, can you believe this weather, dude? Dude, it's totally AWESOME.
Nicely done.
Geezers CKM. You struck a nerve there.
I had a sudden sad image of the movie On the Beach. Nothing much left to do now but take your children in your arms and eat the cyanide pill. Rhetorically speaking I mean (hope).
That is a monstrous shitty feeling.
"Daddy, what did you do to stop the Greedheads from killing the human race during the Great Missed Opportunity era?"
"Not enough son, not enough."
Geezers = Jeezers.
But kinda works either way...
1.) I have always heard it described as the clathrate machine gun, but that is just being picky.
2.) Where's the snapshot. I always look at those first. I feel the need is especially important considering the subject
I rather thought the pornographic under 'Sleep well' was the day's closure.
Post a Comment